Skip to main content

Accidents

CMA CGM Laperouse (2010)

The official report records hull damage to both vessels, which remained manoeuvrable. Contemporary Dutch Coast Guard reporting described water ingress in Thebe's steering-machinery room, controlled by closing watertight compartments. CMA CGM reported minor water ingress in a forward compartment and damage to Laperouse's stern; no pollution, container loss, or loss of stability was reported. A secondary repair report assessed Laperouse's repair damage at EUR 720,000.

Classification

  • Incident Type: Collision
  • Severity: Medium

Vessel Details

FieldValue
Vessel NameCMA CGM Laperouse
Vessel TypeContainer
Flag StateFrance [FR]
IMO Number9454412
Gross Tonnage152991
LOA (m)365.50
Breadth (m)51.20
Bollard Pull (t)
Power (kW)
Owner/OperatorCMA CGM
TEU13344
Year Built2010
Crew Size27
Other VesselThebe, river-sea coaster; IMO 9199696; Antigua & Barbuda [AG]; 89.70 m LOA; 11.65 m breadth; 1,846 GT; 7 crew

Incident Details

FieldValue
Date2010-12-23
LocationOff Vlieland traffic separation scheme, North Sea
Coordinates53.488333, 4.746667
RegionNorth Sea
Fatalities
Injuries0
Missing
Cargo Loss
Direct Damage
Economic DamageEUR 720,000
Insured Loss
Salvage/Cleanup Cost

The official report records hull damage to both vessels, which remained manoeuvrable. Contemporary Dutch Coast Guard reporting described water ingress in Thebe's steering-machinery room, controlled by closing watertight compartments. CMA CGM reported minor water ingress in a forward compartment and damage to Laperouse's stern; no pollution, container loss, or loss of stability was reported. A secondary repair report assessed Laperouse's repair damage at EUR 720,000.

The reviewed reports do not separately enumerate fatalities or missing persons. BEAmer describes Thebe as sailing from Terneuzen to Hamburg; the contemporary Dutch Coast Guard report gives Mongstad, Norway, as the destination.

Key facts

  • At 18:22:15 UTC+1, the bow of CMA CGM Laperouse struck Thebe's stern; the turning stern then made a second contact.
  • BEAmer reported no injuries and no pollution. Both vessels remained manoeuvrable after the collision.
  • Thebe sustained damage in the steering-machinery area and water ingress that was controlled by closing watertight compartments.
  • Thebe proceeded to Den Helder, while CMA CGM Laperouse continued to Hamburg and was later repaired there.
  • BEAmer attributed the collision to human factors, including a late decision by the Laperouse officer of the watch and the absence of a last-minute manoeuvre by Thebe.

Narrative

On 23 December 2010, CMA CGM Laperouse departed Le Havre for Hamburg. In the afternoon it was proceeding northeast in the Off Vlieland traffic separation scheme at about 22 knots while overtaking two vessels, including the river-sea coaster Thebe, which was in ballast. BEAmer describes Thebe's voyage as Terneuzen to Hamburg, while a contemporary Dutch Coast Guard report gives Mongstad, Norway, as the destination. Thebe had seven crew members; the Laperouse had 27.

At 18:18 UTC+1, after considering the traffic and wind, the Laperouse officer of the watch decided to overtake Thebe on its port side. The large container ship came slowly onto the new heading. At 18:22:15, its bow struck the stern of Thebe. As the Laperouse continued to swing, its stern made a second contact with Thebe. The report places the collision at 53°29.3'N, 004°44.8'E. Thebe called on VHF and sent a MAYDAY; Den Helder MRCC initiated the response. After assessing the damage, Thebe proceeded to Den Helder at 19:12, while Laperouse continued to Hamburg with MRCC agreement. The official report states that there were no injuries or pollution and that both vessels remained manoeuvrable.

BEAmer found no contributing material defect. It identified a late decision caused by a misjudgement by the Laperouse officer of the watch as the causal factor, and also noted that Thebe did not attempt a last-minute manoeuvre. The absence of a helmsman on the Laperouse bridge was not neutral to the event. Mer et Marine reported that Laperouse underwent nearly three weeks of repairs in Hamburg, including replacement of about 30 tonnes of steel, with damage assessed at EUR 720,000. No comparable public amount was identified for Thebe.

Sequence of events

Date/timeEvent
2010-12-23 01:30 UTC+1CMA CGM Laperouse departed Le Havre for Hamburg.
2010-12-23 16:00 UTC+1The officer of the watch took over the bridge; a cadet later joined him.
2010-12-23 18:00 UTC+1Laperouse was in the northeastbound Off Vlieland lane at about 22 knots, with Thebe ahead.
2010-12-23 18:18 UTC+1The officer of the watch decided to overtake Thebe on the port side.
2010-12-23 18:22:15 UTC+1Laperouse's bow struck Thebe's stern; a second contact followed as Laperouse swung.
2010-12-23 18:24:44 UTC+1Thebe sent a MAYDAY; Den Helder MRCC responded at 18:25:13.
2010-12-23 19:12 UTC+1Thebe proceeded to Den Helder and Laperouse continued toward Hamburg.

Contributing factors

FactorEvidence statusDescription
Late overtaking decisionConfirmed findingBEAmer found that a misjudgement by the Laperouse officer of the watch delayed the decision to manoeuvre.
No last-minute manoeuvre by ThebeConfirmed findingBEAmer noted that Thebe did not attempt a last-minute manoeuvre or make a precautionary VHF call before the collision.
Bridge watch arrangementConfirmed findingBEAmer stated that the absence of a helmsman on the Laperouse bridge was not neutral to the event.
Heavy weather affecting ThebeConfirmed findingThe report assessed the north-northeasterly force 8-9 wind and heavy sea as borderline for Thebe's manoeuvrability.

Investigation

BEAmer conducted a technical investigation for safety-prevention purposes rather than to assign criminal or civil liability. Its report found that the collision was attributable to human factors: the Laperouse officer of the watch made a late decision after misjudging the situation, and Thebe did not attempt a last-minute manoeuvre. BEAmer reported no material factor directly contributing to the accident and recommended improvements to officer familiarisation and consideration of river-sea vessel manning and construction.

References

Similar incidents