Skip to main content

Accidents

Paula C (2013)

Paula C turned into the path of Darya Gayatri in the Dover Strait after an inexperienced officer of the watch lost situational awareness while avoiding a fishing vessel.

Classification

  • Incident Type: Collision
  • Severity: Medium as the consequence classification; MAIB classified the event as a Serious Marine Casualty.
  • Marine casualty classification: Serious Marine Casualty

Vessel Details

FieldPaula CDarya Gayatri
Vessel NamePaula CDarya Gayatri
Vessel TypeGeneral CargoBulk Carrier
Flag StateUnited Kingdom [GB]China (Hong Kong)
IMO Number93735539591686
Gross Tonnage299844325
LOA (m)89.90229.0
Year Built20082012
Registered ownerCarisbrooke Shipping 636 LtdGayatri Shipping
ManagerCarisbrooke Shipping LtdAnglo-Eastern Ship Management Ltd
Persons aboard820
VoyageBrake to Poole, in ballastIJmuiden to Baltimore, in ballast

Incident Details

FieldValue
Date2013-12-11
TimeApproximately 00:27 UTC
LocationSouth-west lane of the Dover Strait Traffic Separation Scheme, off the south-east coast of England
Coordinates
RegionEnglish Channel
Fatalities0
Injuries0
Missing
Cargo Loss
Physical damagePaula C's port bridge wing, accommodation block, port liferaft davit, and port quarter; Darya Gayatri's port bow
Direct Damage
Economic Damage
Environmental impactNo pollution reported

Key facts

  • Paula C and Darya Gayatri collided in the south-west lane of the Dover Strait Traffic Separation Scheme on 11 December 2013.
  • Paula C's newly qualified second officer was keeping the night watch without an additional lookout.
  • After an avoidance manoeuvre involving the fishing vessel Raquel did not proceed as intended, Paula C altered into Darya Gayatri's path.
  • The Dover Coastguard radio intervention was timely and well-intended but, according to MAIB, almost certainly influenced Paula C's officer of the watch into turning toward Darya Gayatri.
  • Both vessels were damaged, but MAIB reported no injuries, fatalities, or pollution.

Narrative

On the night of 10-11 December 2013, Paula C was south-westbound in ballast in the Dover Strait Traffic Separation Scheme at about 11.9 knots. The master handed the bridge watch to the newly qualified second officer and left the bridge at 2305 UTC. The officer was alone and no additional lookout was posted, despite darkness, dense traffic, and the officer's limited experience.

At 0011 UTC, the officer detected the Belgian beam trawler Raquel ahead. He misclassified the fishing vessel and assessed Paula C as the give-way vessel. The officer did not effectively use the available radar ARPA or AIS information to maintain a proper lookout. Raquel began manoeuvring to clear the traffic lane, but the officer did not recognize the changes and lost situational awareness.

Shortly after 0018 UTC, Paula C altered to starboard without properly checking the starboard quarter, using an ARPA trial manoeuvre, or making a sound signal. Darya Gayatri was overtaking on Paula C's starboard side. A Dover Coastguard call asked whether Paula C intended to make a 360-degree turn. The officer adopted that question as his intended action, selected hand steering, and applied starboard helm without first confirming that the manoeuvre was safe. Darya Gayatri's officer of the watch ordered hard port helm, but neither vessel made a sound signal.

At 0026:52 UTC, Paula C's port bridge wing struck Darya Gayatri's port anchor. Paula C sustained substantial damage to its port bridge wing, accommodation block, liferaft davit, and port quarter. Darya Gayatri's port bow was holed and dented, including a gash above the waterline. Both vessels continued for repairs, and no pollution or personal injuries were reported.

Sequence of events

Date/timeEvent
2013-12-10 22:45 UTCPaula C was south-westbound in the Dover Strait TSS on autopilot at approximately 11.9 knots.
2013-12-10 23:05 UTCThe master left the bridge after handing the watch to the newly qualified second officer.
2013-12-10 23:45 UTCPaula C altered course at a planned waypoint.
2013-12-11 00:11 UTCThe officer detected Raquel ahead and began an avoidance assessment.
2013-12-11 shortly after 00:18 UTCPaula C altered to starboard without adequately checking the starboard quarter.
2013-12-11 00:23-00:24 UTCDover Coastguard called Paula C.
2013-12-11 00:26:52 UTCPaula C's port bridge wing struck Darya Gayatri's port anchor.

Contributing factors

FactorEvidence statusDescription
Loss of situational awareness after avoiding RaquelConfirmed findingMAIB found that Paula C's officer of the watch did not effectively use the available electronic aids and became uncertain about the next action.
Inexperienced officer of the watchConfirmed findingMAIB found that the newly qualified officer had not developed sufficient competence to keep the Dover Strait night watch alone.
No additional lookoutConfirmed findingThe officer was not supported by an additional lookout despite darkness and dense traffic.
Bridge-manning decisionConfirmed findingMAIB found that the master's decision to leave the inexperienced officer alone did not account for the traffic, night conditions, or lookout requirement.
Dover Coastguard interventionReportedMAIB found the intervention timely and well-intended but almost certainly influential in the officer's decision to turn toward Darya Gayatri.
Failure to call the masterConfirmed findingNeither vessel's officer of the watch called the master in time, despite standing orders requiring escalation when in doubt.
No sound signalsReportedMAIB stated that an earlier sound signal might have alerted the other officer, but could not establish that it would have prevented the collision.

Investigation

The Marine Accident Investigation Branch investigated the casualty and published Report No. 25/2014, Paula C and Darya Gayatri, a Serious Marine Casualty report. MAIB identified bridge-manning, officer competence, lookout, electronic-aid use, Coastguard communication, and watchkeeping practices as safety issues. The investigation was conducted to prevent future accidents and did not determine legal liability. Following the accident, the companies and maritime training and safety authorities took corrective actions; MAIB made no recommendations because those actions were already in progress.

References

Similar incidents