Classification
- Incident Type: Collision
- Severity: High
Vessel Details
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Vessel Name | Viking Idun |
| Other Vessel | Chemical Marketer |
| Vessel Type | Passenger vessel; Chemical Marketer: chemical tanker |
| Flag State | Switzerland [CH] for Viking Idun |
| IMO Number | Not reported in reviewed source |
| Gross Tonnage | 3500 |
| LOA (m) | 134.84 |
| Breadth (m) | 11.45 |
| Year Built | 2011 |
| Owner/Operator | Viking River Cruises AG, Switzerland |
| Persons on Board | Viking Idun: 171 passengers and 49 crew; Chemical Marketer: 22 crew |
Incident Details
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-04-01 |
| Time | 00:00:08 local time |
| Location | Western Scheldt, near the Put van Terneuzen |
| Region | Netherlands |
| Coordinates | 51.343650, 3.847970 |
| Fatalities | 0 |
| Missing | 0 |
Key facts
- Chemical Marketer carried cargo including benzene, heptane, and methanol.
- Traffic control required a standard red-to-red passage, under which Viking Idun was to pass astern of Chemical Marketer.
- Viking Idun did not alter to starboard after the passage arrangement was repeated.
- Chemical Marketer's pilot made a late hard-starboard manoeuvre to avoid striking Viking Idun amidships.
- Several passengers sustained minor injuries, and one hotel-service crew member was examined at hospital; the report gives no exact injury count.
- Chemical Marketer suffered a hull tear longer than eight metres, but no cargo escaped.
Narrative
Viking Idun was approaching the locks at Terneuzen during a voyage from Antwerp to Ghent shortly after midnight on 1 April 2019. The Swiss river cruise ship carried 171 passengers and 49 crew members. Chemical Marketer, a chemical tanker with 22 crew, was proceeding in the opposite direction toward Antwerp with cargo that included benzene, heptane, and methanol.
At about 23:55 on 31 March, Chemical Marketer's pilot proposed a green-to-green passage. Terneuzen traffic control rejected that proposal and required the standard red-to-red passage, under which Viking Idun was to pass astern of the tanker. The pilot called Viking Idun for confirmation at about 23:58 but initially received no response. Traffic control repeated the instruction. Viking Idun's captain said he had not understood, requested repetition, and later acknowledged the message, but the cruise ship did not turn to starboard.
Chemical Marketer continued on its course as the vessels closed. At about 23:59:35, its pilot warned that the situation was dangerous and ordered hard starboard to avoid an amidships impact. Traffic control twice called Viking Idun to turn to starboard without further reaction. At 00:00:08, Viking Idun's bow struck Chemical Marketer's port side just aft of the forecastle.
Several Viking Idun passengers sustained minor injuries, and one hotel-service crew member was taken to hospital for examination. The report does not give a total injury count. Viking Idun sustained bow damage and was towed to Terneuzen. Chemical Marketer suffered a hull tear more than eight metres long, about one metre above the waterline, but its double-walled tanks prevented the release of cargo or other liquids.
The Dutch Safety Board concluded that Viking Idun's failure to maintain the prescribed route was the direct cause. It found that the bridge crew lacked sufficient local knowledge and nautical English, that the operator had not adequately checked competence for the voyage, and that supervisory safety barriers were ineffective.
Sequence of events
| Date/time | Event |
|---|---|
| 2019-03-31 21:45 | Viking Idun grounded near buoy 66B in the Nauw van Bath and refloated about 25 minutes later. |
| 2019-03-31 23:55 | Chemical Marketer's pilot proposed green-to-green; traffic control required red-to-red. |
| 2019-03-31 23:58 | Traffic control repeated the passage instruction after Viking Idun did not initially respond. |
| 2019-03-31 23:59:35 | Chemical Marketer's pilot ordered hard starboard as the vessels continued to close. |
| 2019-04-01 00:00:08 | Viking Idun's bow struck Chemical Marketer's port side. |
Contributing factors
| Factor | Evidence status | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Failure to maintain the prescribed route | Confirmed finding | Viking Idun continued across the channel instead of turning to starboard for the agreed red-to-red passage. |
| Insufficient nautical English | Confirmed finding | The bridge crew did not adequately understand or act on the VHF exchanges in the compulsory working language. |
| Insufficient local knowledge | Confirmed finding | The captain had not sailed the Western Scheldt and the first mate's experience there was outdated. |
| Inadequate competence checks | Confirmed finding | Viking River Cruises did not sufficiently verify the deployed bridge crew's competence for the passage. |
| Ineffective supervision | Confirmed finding | Post-grounding checks and traffic-control interventions did not provide effective safeguards before the collision. |
Investigation
The Dutch Safety Board investigated the collision and Viking Idun's earlier grounding. It identified failure to maintain the prescribed route as the direct cause and insufficient local knowledge and nautical English as underlying causes. The Board recommended stronger training and competence testing, tighter local-knowledge and language requirements for river cruise vessels in the Scheldt area, and more effective supervision. The official report does not state a numeric injury total or economic damage estimate.
References
- Dutch Safety Board report: Collision on the Western Scheldt, Viking Idun and Chemical Marketer
- Source note